Monday, October 22, 2012

Surprise, Surprise?

In class tonight Rob made an interesting point when he spoke about Queen Liliuokalani’s observations of American land as it passed by her train. Rob mentioned that the Queen, while looking out of her train window pondered why America must exploit Hawaii’s small amount of far away land when they have so much left uncultivated at home? Rob pointed out that her perspective of the underutilization of American land was similar to that of American colonialist and expansionist thinking. The Queen remarks, “the vast extent of unoccupied land is so enormous. I thought what splendid sugar plantations might here be established, how easily and profitably rice might be grown, and in some other spots with what good returns coffee could be planted.”(P309) Clearly the queen is not some complete savage who has been using coconuts for currency and has no conceptual understanding of the world around her. Throughout the Queen’s memoir it’s evident she’s extraordinarily bright and outside of being a little sheltered in her royal upbringing, she has quite a clear understanding of politics and the trending ideologies of foreign lands. In this previous quote we see that she looks at a piece of uncultivated land and immediately thinks about what changes can be made to turn a profit. While the quote is coming from a place of sadness and is intended to highlight American rapaciousness, still it can be interpreted that she understood the principles of colonial thinking and wasn’t completely opposed to it. Which leads me to my question, do you think that the Queen was really surprised by the events as they unfolded toward Hawaiian annexation? With her premiere education she must have learned about the never satisfied and indefatigable attitude of the American people. In a little over a hundred years The United States had turned from a small colony owned by Great Britain to an emerging world power that had already displaced/killed millions of Native American’s in order to take over their land and had gone toe to toe with Mexico, Great Britain, and Spain amongst others on their way to extending the American Empire all the way to the Pacific edge of North America. So, when the Americans slowly started working their way into the political system of Hawaii, did somebody as Intelligent as the queen really have no way of predicting the possible outcome of America turning Hawaii into land for themselves? It’s easy for me to say in hindsight and from an outsider’s perspective, but I’m wondering if The Queen and her people were blindsided, or if they knew that American colonization was coming and faced the inevitability? (I copy and pasted this from word and for some reason I can't get it to break into paragraphs in this blog format, sorry for the big chunk of writing.)

4 comments:

  1. For indentation I've been using the space bar. I just go to the very end of the line above the one I want to indent, hit enter and then space it out like the tab key would, but using the space bar. I don't know if that'll work for you but it has worked for me.

    As for colonization, to a great extent it had already arrived. Her very getting that education was a colonial tactic--although the missionaries probably didn't realize it was an aggressive act (even with all their "I'm in the lords army" propaganda, they thought of themselves as martyrs, as sacrificing the "civilized" life to christianize the "darkness", and only as an invasion metaphorically).

    As for annexation, the Monroe Doctrine was supposed to end colonialism in the western hemisphere. Also, The Law of Nations states, to paraphrase, that sovereign nations have the same rights as people, and an infringement of those rights is a threat to all other nations in that it jeopardizes international stability (interesting tie in here, interesting tot me, I'm pretty sure the constitution gives congress the right to write their own law of nations separate from that more widely recognized document).

    In the time Liliuokalani was raised, most of the European nations still thought of the United States as "the great democratic experiment", an experiment many thought would fail. She also mentions a president, "...acting with", I think these were the exact words but I don't remember, "that democratic dignity..."

    All of that said, many groups of the people indigenous to north america were recognized by the United States government as constituting nations (at least before 1871) and this did not stop the united states' advances. (Even Abraham Lincoln, thought of by many as a great liberator, as a teen ager marched with a militia in hopes of ousting the Sac and Fox nation).

    They (representatives or citizens of the united states) would make semi-legal trades/treaties/purchases with these "indian nations" and swindle them out of their land. When the people realized they were tricked they would show up on their land, there would be a conflict, and then the army would be brought in on the premise that the the "indian nations" have Attacked Citizens of the Unites States. This process was not something widely known as we know it now, the responsibility being shucked onto the victims.

    As for Liliuokalani, who knows if she knew. It does seem as though her brother was quick to make deals with Japan after that trade agreement went so wrong for the Hawaiians. I would not be surprised if they knew, somehow, if they could see it coming, and just did the best that they could in spite of it.

    So it's a complicated issue. Clearly the united states' advance was insidious, but it painted itself so cavalier. Yeah, so I guess I can't advance your query.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Ha, my indentation technique didn't work.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Great discussion guys. Don't sweat indentation, just make a line break like Joseph did in his post to designate paragraph breaks. I'm sure to some extent that both Kalakaua and Liliuokalani knew that imperial powers were circling their islands, which is why some attempts were made to inter-marry with the royal or ruling families of other powerful countries, in a bid to join their families, maintain autonomy, but perhaps gain a military protectorate and political benefactor in the process. I believe they reached out to Japan, but the offer was rejected on the grounds of wishing to maintain a racial purity (again this is my best recollection, I would defer to Rob and research on this...). Thanks for delving into some meaty issues guys, good work

    - Trey

    ReplyDelete
  4. Did you know that you can shorten your long urls with AdFocus and get $$$$ for every click on your short urls.

    ReplyDelete