The final section of this passage concludes as such: "There was no toil, clang, or hurry. People were all holiday-making (if that can be where there is no work), and enjoying themselves, the surf-bathers in the sea, and hundreds of gaily-dressed men and women galloping on the beach. It was serene and tropical. I sympathize with those who eat the lotus, and remain for ever on such enchanted shores" (Bird 122). Again, Bird dramatically fantasizes over the Hawaii forever (dis)placed in her imagination. These "enchanted shores" are only magical because a white, Anglo woman has deemed it so. Instead of picking beneath the surface (or should I say the shore?), Bird pretends that the only concern of the island is this "holiday-making." She presents the citizens as glorified retirees with permanent smiles painted across their faces. In short, she assists in (mis)representing the island as an oasis, an Eden, a place of definite relaxation and free from all quotidian cares. She plays a role, as with many of the other visiters, in typifying the outsider's lust for the escapism that Hawaii seems to offer. But buried beneath the layers of sand, the oily paint coating of those surfing borads, the billowing waves of the surf, existed a whole underground of untapped sources, of more complicated histories, of conflict and suffering, of a culture engrained in a complicated story. But I guess it's easier to just kick back and observe the surf than to peel back the supposedly ideal surface of Hawaii's sandy coat.
-Jon Vorpe
Jon -
ReplyDeleteYour last four sentences were excellent. Not that the rest of your post was bad, but that writing just shines compared to the rest of it. I have to heartily disagree with your reading of "maidens" contextually, believing it to be more representative of youth and fairness (the trope of the Islands themselves represented to the western imaginary as both female and available for the taking) than a moniker denoting a class status. Gendered yes. And as Rob pointed out in lecture, Bishop's writings have been criticized as being nothing but a regurgitation of past depictions of Hawaii (some practically verbatim), which you aptly distill in your conclusion.
- Trey